Dear Users! Please post bug reports about FDM here!

FDM 5.x Feature Request

Moderators: Usher, Alex

What feature do you want to see in 5.x the most?

You may select up to 3 options

 
 
View results
johnlgalt
Posts: 475
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:04 pm
Location: 3rd Rock
Contact:

FDM 5.x Feature Request

Postby johnlgalt » Fri Mar 18, 2016 9:01 pm

Hi, all. I'm posting this as a thread here as opposed to the 5.x Beta thread as a single post there would easily get lost, but a thread here would be easy to find as I think up more features to request. If this is in error, please let me know.

So, I was a very long time user of the FDM 3.x series, and a small contributor here in the forums here and there. I went to another DM for a good while, starting with beta releases from them, and only now have come back to FDM and this particular beta after a long hiatus.

I like the design. Being an Android mobile guy, with its move toward what they call Material Design, I'm a lot more enthusiastic of using this DM over the older 3.x. And, it has a lot going for it, the most important being easy integration into Firefox Nightly 48.0.1α. The integrated Torrent DM is a great thing too.

However, I have some RFFs.

  1. I cannot edit the file name when downloading. I saw someone a couple of pages ago mention this as well, and it irks me, too. Sometimes programs, particularly installations, are linked to a setup.exe file, with no other indication of what the program is. If I don't note it right then and there what the program actually is, then later on in my dowload folder I might have 2, 3 or more seup.exe files (obviously renamed with naming scheme of adding numbers in parentheses) that I have to run in order to figure out what they are. Please allow filename editing.
  2. The FDM manager window will pop up automatically when a DL is added - but then stays there. Old version allowed us to hide the notification window after making a selection as to whether I should download or not.
  3. Re-add checking for existing downloads, with the full scheme of allowing the user to decide on the fly whether to rename or replace.
  4. Integrate hash check during download.
  5. Add the comment feature back in (goes along with editing the filename, really, but I'd actually prefer the comments over directly editing the filename itself, if it comes own to picking between either option).
  6. Add the check for file mirrors.
  7. Allow us to specify settings per site as well as per download with regards to how many segments to use, DL speed, etc.
  8. Add the floating monitor that is active in a variety of manners - never, when downloading, or always.

These are the major features I want to see - basically, I don't mind the new UI, but please bring the features from the old 3.x versions into this, even if it means installing them as extensions to the default software. If I can think of anymore I'll add them here.

Addendum: First option, filename editing, has been removed because it can already be performed in FDM 5. because of this, the poll has been reset, and I'm allowing up to 3 options now per vote.
Last edited by johnlgalt on Mon Mar 28, 2016 1:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
__

I am I.

Please read the FDM FAQ and to report bugs follows the instructions in this post:
How to report bugs for FDM
User6545
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:19 am

Re: FDM 5.x Feature Request

Postby User6545 » Mon Mar 28, 2016 5:07 am

Is it possible to make FDM's downloading speed "dynamic"?

What I meant by dynamic, is that, FDM will download at the highest possible download speed/bandwidth it gets from the connection(s) unless some other processes (like, browsers) are requesting bandwidth at the same time. When other processes requests bandwidths, FDM will dynamically reduce its bandwidth limit and let others use the bandwidth as they needed, and after that when the bandwidth is freed from other processes, FDM will use the freed bandwidth again as it needs.

I know there are processes like limiting traffics, snail mode. But as I see FDM doesn't respect those limits. Though it shows the using speed/bandwidth as set, but behind the scene it uses the whole available bandwidth.
How?
Just after un-limiting the traffic limit, FDM will show the average of its speed, which will be more than available bandwidth, which is the average of its previous (hidden uses) and current uses.
And also, while limiting the traffic, looking at 'Resource Monitor (Windows) > Network' it's clearly seen that FDM still uses the full bandwidth while being limited.

Thanks :)
:)
johnlgalt
Posts: 475
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:04 pm
Location: 3rd Rock
Contact:

Re: FDM 5.x Feature Request

Postby johnlgalt » Mon Mar 28, 2016 1:50 pm

Dynamic speed limits added. As poll options have changed, poll has been reset.
__

I am I.

Please read the FDM FAQ and to report bugs follows the instructions in this post:
How to report bugs for FDM
User6545
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:19 am

Re: FDM 5.x Feature Request

Postby User6545 » Tue Mar 29, 2016 5:06 am

johnlgalt wrote:Dynamic speed limits added. As poll options have changed, poll has been reset.


I still support the 3 vote method. And it will also prevents the users who will vote all options, thus those votes will become neutral.

But in addition to all those, I guess, it would be better if there were a custom written list to hold all the options and their last amount of votes.

What's the benefit?
The custom written list will make it easier to keep track of votes even after new items are being added, thus previous votes will be preserved. And after addition of any of the features into FDM, it can easily be removed from the list, and can also be kept in another custom list (if needed). And as a bonus we will always have a history of our list.

So, how to do?

Starting List >

Features Users Wish FDM Would Have
Feature - Last Updated Votes(compare polling and this list, greater is counted)[*this text is for new coming users to read]
  • 1. A feature to be implemented - 3
  • 2. Another feature - 1

Above is an example how a custom list can be kept. This list could/would be updated before a new feature is added, thus previous votes will be tracked.

After new feature >

Features Users Wish FDM Would Have
Feature - Last Updated Votes(compare polling and this list, greater is counted)[*this text is for new coming users to read]
  • 1. A feature to be implemented - 45
  • 2. Another feature - 33
  • 3. Yet another feature - 0


When a feature is added into FDM, the list can easily be removed from the poll and also from the custom list, and if needed another custom list can keep the history.

After feature addition into FDM >

Features Users Wish FDM Would Have
Feature - Last Updated Votes(compare polling and this list, greater is counted)[*this text is for new coming users to read]
  • 1. Another feature - 33
  • 2. Yet another feature - 0

Features Implemented
Feature - Last Updated Votes
  • 1. A feature to be implemented - 45


This seems lot to do, does it need to be updated regularly?
Initially it's a bit, but after that it's a lot less to do, and much more helpful, I guess. As the custom list would be updated only after a new item is added or removed, and in addition we'll always have the previous votes. No vote loss, as it happened just after adding dynamic speed limit addition.

So, where to put?
This list can be put into your first post, as it would be easier to see.


Thanks for reading, it's bit long :)
:)
johnlgalt
Posts: 475
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:04 pm
Location: 3rd Rock
Contact:

Re: FDM 5.x Feature Request

Postby johnlgalt » Tue Mar 29, 2016 6:42 am

Good idea. I did not consider noting the votes before making the changes, so I was not able to do anything like that before. I'll try to keep a note of it going forward.
__

I am I.

Please read the FDM FAQ and to report bugs follows the instructions in this post:
How to report bugs for FDM
johnlgalt
Posts: 475
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:04 pm
Location: 3rd Rock
Contact:

Re: FDM 5.x Feature Request

Postby johnlgalt » Tue Mar 29, 2016 6:44 am

Also, do note that I am not affiliated with FDM in any manner. I am an independent user who started this poll because I loved FDM 3.x and used it for a very long time, but it simply stopped suiting my needs when WinX came around in beta form. At the time, FDM 5 was also very much an alpha product. Now, having returned to try it again, I see marked improvement in the product, and I want to offer suggestions to make it as functional and utilitarian as the 3.x version without sacrificing their vision of the current generation's path.
__

I am I.

Please read the FDM FAQ and to report bugs follows the instructions in this post:
How to report bugs for FDM
User6545
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:19 am

Re: FDM 5.x Feature Request

Postby User6545 » Wed Mar 30, 2016 4:45 am

johnlgalt wrote:Also, do note that I am not affiliated with FDM in any manner. I am an independent user ....


As FDM is released under GPL and FDM team's approach of supporting/developing features for 5.x series based on user's request, I believe this post of your can potentially become the ultimate go-to for users and developers, and become the linkage between the both, and community is the key factor for opensource software. If this post get pinned by FDM team to organize requests, or if they build something to manage feature requests, that would be great for both users and developers, I believe.

My journey also started at 3.x, and still 3.x is the best of FDM, though 5.x also have some amazing features, it still has a lot of room to grow.


Thanks :)
:)
qwert098

Re: FDM 5.x Feature Request

Postby qwert098 » Wed Mar 30, 2016 11:23 am

Another option (add reply please)

Refresh download - which allow user to refresh the download URL by using monitoring tools.

Return to “General forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests