Dear Users! Please post bug reports about FDM here!

FDM 3.9.1 Release Candidate

Moderators: Usher, Alex

mono

Re: FDM 3.9.1 BETA

Postby mono » Sun May 27, 2012 1:37 pm

if i enable fdm plugin in firefox and i open fb games such as
http://apps.facebook.com/avengersallian ... _bmpos=1_2

firefox will become cripple whenever i hover my mouse over the flash area.
ive tried disable fdm plugin, and theres no problem running the game. so i think its not browser problem.

anyway to solve this? thanks :)
User avatar
Usher
Posts: 2567
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 2:37 pm
Location: Poland

Re: FDM 3.9.1 BETA

Postby Usher » Mon May 28, 2012 6:16 pm

mono wrote:if i enable fdm plugin in firefox and i open fb games such as
(...)
firefox will become cripple whenever i hover my mouse over the flash area.
What is your FDM plugin version? And Firefox version?
Have you tried to disable only flash video monitoring in FDM?
Have you tried to leave FDM plugin enabled and disable other Firefox extensions?
Andrzej P. Wozniak, FDM user and forum moderator
Read FDM FAQ and the reporting rules
"How to report a bug or a problem with FDM" before posting
Guest

Re: FDM 3.9.1 BETA

Postby Guest » Mon May 28, 2012 6:55 pm

FDM ver. 3.9 build 1249

is this new beta?

Old one was FDM ver. 3.9 build 1252

Can you please clarify?
User avatar
Usher
Posts: 2567
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 2:37 pm
Location: Poland

Re: FDM 3.9.1 BETA

Postby Usher » Mon May 28, 2012 7:50 pm

Guest wrote:FDM ver. 3.9 build 1249
is this new beta?
Old one was FDM ver. 3.9 build 1252
Can you please clarify?

The higher build number, the newer FDM version.
Andrzej P. Wozniak, FDM user and forum moderator
Read FDM FAQ and the reporting rules
"How to report a bug or a problem with FDM" before posting
Guest

Re: FDM 3.9.1 BETA

Postby Guest » Mon May 28, 2012 8:01 pm

Usher wrote:
Guest wrote:FDM ver. 3.9 build 1249
is this new beta?
Old one was FDM ver. 3.9 build 1252
Can you please clarify?

The higher build number, the newer FDM version.



FDM ver. 3.9 build 1249 was released today & supports newer browsers

Old one was FDM ver. 3.9 build 1252 was earlier in the month & doesn't support newer browsers

Also switching to this build looses all the downloads

(will a new beta will come assuming this is stable??)
Guest

Re: FDM 3.9.1 BETA

Postby Guest » Mon May 28, 2012 8:08 pm

Guest wrote:
Usher wrote:
Guest wrote:FDM ver. 3.9 build 1249
is this new beta?
Old one was FDM ver. 3.9 build 1252
Can you please clarify?

The higher build number, the newer FDM version.



FDM ver. 3.9 build 1249 was released today & supports newer browsers

Old one was FDM ver. 3.9 build 1252 was earlier in the month & doesn't support newer browsers

Also switching to this build looses all the downloads

(will a new beta will come assuming this is stable??)


3.8 was stable right so this has to be beta?
User avatar
Usher
Posts: 2567
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 2:37 pm
Location: Poland

Re: FDM 3.9.1 BETA

Postby Usher » Tue May 29, 2012 12:34 am

Guest wrote:FDM ver. 3.9 build 1249 was released today & supports newer browsers
It's 3.9 version bugfixed to be stable, and this topic is about 3.9.1 beta version. "New features" described on the download page are new in comparison with previous stable 3.8 version, not with current 3.9.1 beta.
Many programs are developed in more than one version at a time. Older versions have only security patches and bugfixes added while newer versions may contain also new features. For example Firefox 10.0.4esr is newer then Firefox 11 and as new as Firefox 12, but it doesn't mean you shouldn't (or can't) use Firefox 12, 13 beta or newer. The choice is up to you: want a stable base - use the lastest subversion of the older version; want new features - use newer versions, possibly unstable.
Andrzej P. Wozniak, FDM user and forum moderator
Read FDM FAQ and the reporting rules
"How to report a bug or a problem with FDM" before posting
Guest

Re: FDM 3.9.1 BETA

Postby Guest » Tue May 29, 2012 2:11 am

Usher wrote:
Guest wrote:FDM ver. 3.9 build 1249 was released today & supports newer browsers
It's 3.9 version bugfixed to be stable, and this topic is about 3.9.1 beta version. "New features" described on the download page are new in comparison with previous stable 3.8 version, not with current 3.9.1 beta.
Many programs are developed in more than one version at a time. Older versions have only security patches and bugfixes added while newer versions may contain also new features. For example Firefox 10.0.4esr is newer then Firefox 11 and as new as Firefox 12, but it doesn't mean you shouldn't (or can't) use Firefox 12, 13 beta or newer. The choice is up to you: want a stable base - use the lastest subversion of the older version; want new features - use newer versions, possibly unstable.


Thanks for that & will these fixes be rolled into beta too(very soon) :)
but its should have said 3.9.0 then :shock:
Guest

Re: FDM 3.9.1 BETA

Postby Guest » Tue May 29, 2012 8:09 am

Probbaly a better management of version numbering should help to clarify that and avoid request that are quite normal.

The current situation is

3.9.0.1249 latest offciial
3.9.1.1252 latest beta

Is it true?

But as most of the user expected 3.9.0.1249 support newer browser that 3.9.1.1252 don't support.
If it's true is a bad management oif version numbering.
If 3.9.0.1249 offer more option and is newer than 3.9.1.1252 the 3.9.0.1249 should be numbere like 3.9.2.1249 to clarify that is newer than 3.9.1.1252.
bovirus
Posts: 55
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 9:02 am

Re: FDM 3.9.1 BETA

Postby bovirus » Tue May 29, 2012 8:19 am

In the homepage there is an error

Current stable version: FDM ver. 3.8 build 1249

FDM ver. 3.9 build 1249
Guest

Re: FDM 3.9.1 BETA

Postby Guest » Tue May 29, 2012 10:29 am

Guest wrote:Probbaly a better management of version numbering should help to clarify that and avoid request that are quite normal.

The current situation is

3.9.0.1249 latest offciial
3.9.1.1252 latest beta

Is it true?

But as most of the user expected 3.9.0.1249 support newer browser that 3.9.1.1252 don't support.
If it's true is a bad management oif version numbering.
If 3.9.0.1249 offer more option and is newer than 3.9.1.1252 the 3.9.0.1249 should be numbere like 3.9.2.1249 to clarify that is newer than 3.9.1.1252.


Totally agree & also they should follow Firefox esque release channel
User avatar
Usher
Posts: 2567
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 2:37 pm
Location: Poland

Re: FDM 3.9.1 BETA

Postby Usher » Tue May 29, 2012 10:31 am

Guest wrote:The current situation is
3.9.0.1249 latest offciial
3.9.1.1252 latest beta
Is it true?
Yes.


Guest wrote:But as most of the user expected 3.9.0.1249 support newer browser that 3.9.1.1252 don't support.
Wrong. As I have explained earlier, "new features" in 3.9.0 are new in comparison with 3.8 version, not with 3.9.1 version. For example, FDM 3.9.1 beta versions support the same Firefox versions as FDM 3.9.0.1249, though they may be undeclared in install.rdf file in some older builds. It's normal for beta versions.
You can check that plugin in FDM 3.9.1.1252 works also with Firefox 15, if you change

Code: Select all

<em:maxVersion>14.*.*</em:maxVersion>
to

Code: Select all

<em:maxVersion>*.*.*</em:maxVersion>
in install.rdf.


Guest wrote:If it's true is a bad management oif version numbering.
If 3.9.0.1249 offer more option and is newer than 3.9.1.1252 the 3.9.0.1249 should be numbere like 3.9.2.1249 to clarify that is newer than 3.9.1.1252.
Wrong again. 3.9.2 version should be based on 3.9.1 and contain new features, including some features introduced in 3.9.1 version.
In my opinion it should be 3.9.0.1259 number because build numbers should only grow. See Opera build numbers (sorted by date) for comparison:
Opera stable 11.52 build 1100
Opera next 12.00 build 1116
Opera stable 11.60 build 1185
Opera next 12.00 build 1191
Opera stable 11.61 build 1250
Opera next 12.00 build 1306
Opera stable 11.62 build 1306
Opera beta 12.00 build 1387
Opera stable 11.64 build 1403
Opera next 12.00 build 1424 etc.

If you want to learn more, you should read about developing in parallel branches - Linux kernel versioning, software version control systems (f.e. CVS, Subversion), etc. Some Wikipedia links for the start:
- Software versioning
- Revision control
Andrzej P. Wozniak, FDM user and forum moderator
Read FDM FAQ and the reporting rules
"How to report a bug or a problem with FDM" before posting
mUNtarii

Re: FDM 3.9.1 BETA

Postby mUNtarii » Tue May 29, 2012 10:32 am

Guest wrote:
Usher wrote:
Guest wrote:FDM ver. 3.9 build 1249 was released today & supports newer browsers
It's 3.9 version bugfixed to be stable...

now i am confused...
is 3.9 a stable version or not... on the download page there is not clear if 3.9 is stable as well...


Moderators: Usher, Victoria Nelson, vaneo, Alex

Care to respond & help users?
You guys don't tell anything
People are requesting features , fixes , clarification but you guys see to be a bit too busy
please listen to your users !

p:s- a LOYAL USER
Last edited by Usher on Tue May 29, 2012 2:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Unneded image deleted. Don't use pictures to repost questions asked in plain text.
Guest

Re: FDM 3.9.1 BETA

Postby Guest » Tue May 29, 2012 10:38 am

If it's true is a bad management oif version numbering.
If 3.9.0.1249 offer more option and is newer than 3.9.1.1252 the 3.9.0.1249 should be numbere like 3.9.2.1249



@USHER

he quite clearly mentioned "offer more option and is newer than" As in new features!!

so he is quite right
And please be polite
User avatar
Usher
Posts: 2567
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 2:37 pm
Location: Poland

Re: FDM 3.9.1 BETA

Postby Usher » Tue May 29, 2012 2:03 pm

bovirus wrote:In the homepage there is an error
Current stable version: FDM ver. 3.8 build 1249
FDM ver. 3.9 build 1249

Yes, you are right, but I'm not a webmaster and I can't fix it.
Andrzej P. Wozniak, FDM user and forum moderator
Read FDM FAQ and the reporting rules
"How to report a bug or a problem with FDM" before posting

Return to “General forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests